REALATED ARTICLES

Click on a word or phrase in our Tag Cloud and see all related articles listed below.

 

Current tag:

Biomet: Charged with Foreign Bribery

Biomet 3I do Brasil26-03-2012. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today charged Warsaw, Indiana-based medical device company Biomet Inc. with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) when its subsidiaries and agents bribed public doctors in Argentina, Brazil, and China for nearly a decade to win business. Biomet, which primarily sells products used by orthopedic surgeons, agreed to pay more than $22 million to settle the SEC’s charges as well as parallel criminal charges announced by the U.S. Department of Justice today. The charges arise from the SEC and DOJ’s ongoing proactive global investigation into medical device companies bribing publicly-employed physicians.


The SEC alleges that Biomet and its four subsidiaries paid bribes from 2000 to August 2008, and employees and managers at all levels of the parent company and the subsidiaries were involved along with the distributors who sold Biomet’s products. Biomet’s compliance and internal audit functions failed to stop the payments to doctors even after learning about the illegal practices. “Biomet’s misconduct came to light because of the government’s proactive investigation of bribery within the medical device industry,” said Kara Novaco Brockmeyer, Chief of the Enforcement Division’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Unit. “A company’s compliance and internal audit should be the first line of defense against corruption, not part of the problem.” According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Washington D.C., employees of Biomet Argentina SA paid kickbacks as high as 15 to 20 percent of each sale to publicly-employed doctors in Argentina. Phony invoices were used to justify the payments, and the bribes were falsely recorded as “consulting fees” or “commissions” in Biomet’s books and records. Executives and internal auditors at Biomet’s Indiana headquarters were aware of the payments as early as 2000, but failed to stop it.

Biomet3I do Brasil Centro Profissional
The SEC alleges that Biomet’s U.S. subsidiary Biomet International used a distributor to bribe publicly-employed doctors in Brazil by paying them as much as 10 to 20 percent of the value of their medical device purchases. Payments were openly discussed in communications between the distributor, Biomet International employees, and Biomet’s executives and internal auditors in the U.S. For example, a February 2002 internal Biomet memorandum about a limited audit of the distributor’s books stated:


Brazilian Distributor makes payments to surgeons that may be considered as a kickback. These payments are made in cash that allows the surgeon to receive income tax free. …The accounting entry is to increase a prepaid expense account. In the consolidated financials sent to Biomet, these payments were reclassified to expense in the income statement.


According to the SEC’s complaint, two additional subsidiaries – Biomet China and Scandimed AB – sold medical devices through a distributor in China who provided publicly-employed doctors with money and travel in exchange for their purchases of Biomet products. Beginning as early as 2001, the distributor exchanged e-mails with Biomet employees that explicitly described the bribes he was arranging on the company’s behalf. For example, one e-mail stated:


[Doctor] is the department head of [public hospital]. [Doctor] uses about 10 hips and knees a month and it’s on an uptrend, as he told us over dinner a week ago. …Many key surgeons in Shanghai are buddies of his. A kind word on Biomet from him goes a long way for us. Dinner has been set for the evening of the 24th. It will be nice. But dinner aside, I’ve got to send him to Switzerland to visit his daughter.


The SEC alleges that some e-mails described the way that vendors would deliver cash to surgeons upon completion of surgery, and others discussed the amount of payments. The distributor explained in one e-mail that 25 percent in cash would be delivered to a surgeon upon completion of surgery. Biomet sponsored travel for 20 Chinese surgeons in 2007 to Spain, where a substantial part of the trip was devoted to sightseeing and other entertainment.


Biomet consented to the entry of a court order requiring payment of $4,432,998 in disgorgement and $1,142,733 in prejudgment interest. Biomet also is ordered to retain an independent compliance consultant for 18 months to review its FCPA compliance program, and is permanently enjoined from future violations of Sections 30A, 13(b)(2)(A), and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Biomet agreed to pay a $17.28 million fine to settle the criminal charges.

Sources: SEC; Photos: Biomet 3i do Brasil;

Related Articles

No Mercy with Violators of Corporate Compliance

Dr Rüdiger Scheitza, Member of the Board Bayer CropScience, and Labour Director, including example of Brazilian operations

OECD: Brazil needs to improve systems to promote greater integrity in public service

Kuros Treats First Patient With KUR-023

28-02-2011. Kuros Biosurgery AG, a biotechnology company focused on the development of novel biomaterials and bioactive-biomaterial combination products for trauma, wound and spinal indications, announced today that it has treated the first patient in a pilot clinical trial investigating the safety and efficacy of KUR-023, its novel dural sealant product candidate.
KUR-023 is a synthetic hydrogel-based sealant that utilises Kuros' synthetic technology. The product candidate is administered as a spray with the aim of ensuring water-tight closure of incisions or tears through the dura mater.  It is intended to be used as an adjunct to normal closure techniques such as suturing. The trial is a European, single arm, multi-center, study that will recruit 40 patients. The primary endpoint refers to the prevention of intraoperative leakage with secondary endpoints related to safety and further efficacy assessment. KUR-023 is delivered from a double barrelled syringe with a mixing spray tip. The product candidate is delivered as a spray which then arrives on the dura as a liquid, conforms to the surface, and quickly polymerises.  The applied gel is expected to adhere strongly to the dural surface and be able to withstand cerebral pressures in excess of those experienced in a patient. The gel is designed to be easy to apply, to swell minimally (addresses a common problem with hydrogels), to dissolve over a period of a few months and not to interfere with the natural healing process. Kuros’ synthetic technology is based on technology originally developed by Prof. Jeffrey Hubbell. The technology uses a cross-linking chemistry which is highly specific, does not generate any heat and is an addition reaction, meaning that no chemicals are released during the polymerisation process. Didier Cowling, Chief Executive Officer of Kuros, commented: “Our dural sealant candidate, KUR-023, is our most advanced product candidate that is based on our proprietary synthetic technology platform.  Initiation of this clinical study is an important milestone for Kuros.

______________

Disclaimer: You agree that B2Bioworld is not responsible and will not be held liable for any third party content on its sites or any third-party content, products or services available on other web sites accessed through links from B2Bioworld sites. Links to third-party sites are for your convenience only, and their inclusion on B2Bioworld's sites does not imply any endorsement, guarantee, warranty or representation by B2Bioworld.

Top 10 Tags

All Tags (2094)